Ladywood Unite asked the MP Candidates to reply to ‘six ask’ requested by community members. Their statements in response are below, presented in the order they were received.
MP Candidate response – Lee Dargue (Liberal Democrats)
Good afternoon
Thank you for your email, and thank you for raising this with all candidates. I absolutely commit to all 6 items, and have left any additional feedback for you below.
I know first-hand of your exemplary work in representing the people of Ladywood, thank you on behalf of Ladywood, especially from those people you’ll never know you’ve helped.
Kind regards,
Lee Dargue
Birmingham Ladywood candidate, Liberal Democrats
Tw: @leedargue
There are serious issues of injustice for the approximately 6,000 people inside the Ladywood Regeneration zone that we ask our MP candidates to commit to addressing by taking the following actions:
1. Meet with representatives of Ladywood Unite both before and after the election to form the basis of future engagement
Absolutely! Regardless of the result of the election, I will continue to support Ladywood Unite.
2. Work to stop compulsory purchase and demolition of freehold houses, good quality and new homes including leasehold houses, and churches
This is a key priority, and with the continued flippant and seemingly uncaring responses from the Council’s regeneration team, is even more of a focus for LU, the community, and local politicians to be given as much detail as possible, with a significant ramp-up in genuine consultation
3. Work to prevent the displacement of a diverse and vibrant community, aiming to preserve community and family networks across generations
LU represent the best of the Ladywood community spirit – strong, yet open, fearless, yet welcoming and inclusive. To have a luxury developer and a careless Council think they can bulldoze – both literally and figuratively – their way through Ladywood shows that they never knew what they’d come up against. The deadlines we see keep moving on, and on – this to me shows that they are struggling to cope with what they thought would be an easy pushover!
4. Work to redress power imbalances favouring a luxury developer and the council over residents, advocating for residents to be able to make decisions about their future
It would be good for politicians to stand up to the developer and Council. We know that doesn’t mean we have to go in screaming and shouting, but even daring to ask questions seems to be impossible for this currently Labour-run Council and the cost relationship with the (previous) Labour MP. The core way for that to happen is for genuine consultation, which can only really start from a blank piece of paper with everyone represented, to work together on the “masterplan” (or whatever it’s called this week).
5. Work to provide clarity and commitment on plans for social and affordable housing, aiming to update current plans offering no social housing at all, and supporting accelerating repairs for properties that need them now
It’s completely unacceptable to have zero social homes as the accepted level. We know that “affordable” homes are only affordable to a select few, and that often doesn’t include many who already live in the area. Social Homes are not only affordable for residents, the new build materials and processes mean easier maintenance for the Council, lower running costs for the inhabitants, and few emissions during build and life of the building to help protect the environment
6. Raise the matters affecting us in the House of Commons, especially the need to close viability loopholes in planning and strengthening diverse community input early on in, and throughout, regeneration planning
Regardless of the result, I will work on this with my Lib Dem colleagues in both the Commons and Lords. We have a significant number in the Lords already – I’m expecting a big increase in Lib Dem MPs at the election too, meaning we’d have much more influence to create and modify legislation.
MP Candidate response – Shazna Muzammil (Conservatives)
Dear Members of the Ladywood Unite Executive Committee,
Thank you for your crucial role in advocating for the residents of Ladywood. I deeply appreciate the time you dedicated to our meeting, as well as the insights shared by the lady in Church. It’s evident that the uncertainty you all face is unjust. The community is grappling with significant challenges due to the proposed regeneration plans. I am grateful for the opportunity to outline how I plan to support and represent the interests of Ladywood if elected.
Meet with representatives of Ladywood Unite both before and after the election to form the basis of future engagement.
I am dedicated to establishing an ongoing dialogue with Ladywood Unite, scheduling regular consultations to ensure that all community voices are not only heard but are central to shaping our collaborative response. I believe that representatives from within the residents should have a seat at the table in ongoing discussions surrounding the regeneration plans, and I will advocate strongly for this inclusion.
Work to stop compulsory purchase and demolition of freehold houses, good quality and new homes including leasehold houses, and churches
I am acutely aware of the deep concerns regarding the potential loss of homes and community spaces. As your MP, I will not stand idly by while our community is uprooted. I will staunchly oppose any compulsory purchase and demolition that does not have clear, demonstrable benefits for the residents or that fails to provide adequate and just compensations and alternatives. I will advocate for a complete reassessment of these plans, aiming for a community-led approach. Furthermore, I will push for alternatives that consider preserving and enhancing communal structures like the church rather than demolishing it.
Work to prevent the displacement of a diverse and vibrant community, aiming to preserve community and family networks across generations.
From my observations and the residents I have had the privilege to meet, it is clear that the heart of Ladywood lies in its community, its people, and its diversity. I am committed to preserving this by ensuring that any development respects and enhances these ties, preventing displacement and safeguarding the unique social fabric of our area. Your community and family networks are the backbone of Ladywood, and I am dedicated to their preservation.
Work to redress power imbalances favouring a luxury developer and the council over residents, advocating for residents to be able to make decisions about their future:
I pledge to challenge any unfair practices by developers or the council. It is crucial that developers engaging with Ladywood are reputable and have a history of responsible community engagement. I will push for transparency, accountability, and significant resident involvement in every step of the regeneration process.
Work to provide clarity and commitment on plans for social and affordable housing, aiming to update current plans offering no social housing at all, and supporting accelerating repairs for properties that need them now:
I will work tirelessly to ensure that the redevelopment plans include a substantial proportion of social and affordable housing. It is unacceptable for current plans to disregard the needs of those who require these accommodations most. I will push for immediate action on repairing existing properties that residents depend on and holding the council accountable for not meeting decent homes standards.
Raise the matters affecting us in the House of Commons, especially the need to close viability loopholes in planning and strengthening diverse community input early on in, and throughout regeneration planning
Using my position, should I be elected, I will advocate for legislative changes that close planning loopholes and enhance community participation, ensuring that Ladywood’s voice is heard loud and clear in Parliament.
I have also read your long list of questions submitted by residents, and I would like to reiterate that if elected, I will bring this to the table and restart this process with resident-led plans being drawn up with the council. The involvement of residents in these conversations is paramount, and I support forming a steering group that includes residents and skilled individuals who can contribute positively to the regeneration process.
While it may seem like electoral timing has spurred interest in Ladywood’s regeneration, the truth is that meaningful involvement can only begin with election to office. It is concerning that your current MP has not engaged as expected. This election presents an opportunity for change, and I am here, openly committing to that change.
Please consider my candidacy as one dedicated to real change, genuine engagement, and the well-being of every Ladywood resident.
Thank you once again for this vital dialogue and I’m here if you need.
Warm regards,
Shaz Muzammil
Shaz a Muzammil
Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for Birmingham Ladywood
W: Shazna Muzammil | Parliamentary Candidate for Birmingham
Twitter: @Shazna_Muzammil
MP Candidate response – Zoe Challenor (Green Party)
Thank you for being in touch about the hugely important issue of the Ladywood Regeneration Scheme. I wholeheartedly agree with all of Ladywood Unite’s six points, and have added comments below:
1) I would be delighted to meet with representatives of Ladywood Unite
Having spoken to families who stand to be affected by the scheme, I am appalled by the lack of meaningful consultation with the community on such an important issue. I have spoken with people who have lived in their homes for 30 years, are deeply rooted and woven into the neighbourhood around them, and who stand to lose not only a house, but a community. I am so grateful for and impressed by the energy with which Ladywood Unite has been campaigning on behalf of residents, creating organisation and strength in numbers, and would love to know more and understand how I can best support you.
2) I fully support working “to stop the compulsory purchase and demolition of freehold houses, good quality and new homes including leasehold houses, and churches.”
I grew up in Ladywood and love and respect our vibrant and diverse community. It is unconscionable to me that the Council and Berkeley Group consider it a good idea to bulldoze a whole community without meaningful community engagement and consultation.
I am aware of Council documents from last year stating that “initiating the compulsory purchase process will make the seriousness of the authority’s intentions clear from the outset, which in turn might encourage those whose land is affected to enter more readily into meaningful negotiations” making clear that the Council intends to use the threat of compulsory purchase as a tool to gain the compliance of Ladywood residents.
And of course, there are many council tenants who don’t have any protection at all.
3) Yes, we absolutely must “work to prevent the displacement of a diverse and vibrant community, aiming to preserve community and family networks across generations.”
We are seeing people being treated as though they were chess pieces to be moved around at the will of developers. Headlines like “Berkeley set to bag £2.2bn Birmingham estate overhaul” https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/buildings/berkeley-set-to-bag-2-2bn-birmingham-estate-overhaul-21-06-2023/ speak volumes, as do the lip service consultation process we have seen, and the exclusion of many residents from public meetings so that they have literally been left out in the cold with their voices unheard. All of this points towards a profit over people mentality and a lack of meaningful community engagement.
Birmingham City Council claims that the development “will address both social and environmental issues and deliver significant benefits for the local community and wider Birmingham economy.” I think if they intend people to believe those words, there needs to be a full and meaningful process of consulting with the local community and hearing what residents themselves think would benefit them.
4) I fully support working “to redress power imbalances favouring a luxury developer and the council over residents, advocating for residents to be able to make decisions about their future”
As far back as the 1960s, Joe Holyoak wrote of Ladywood that “residents had no representation, but had planning done to them. The result was a community which was swept away, together with its familiar streets and landmarks” Norman Power also wrote of the destruction of a resilient and rooted community as the old Victorian neighbourhood was bulldozed and replaced with high-rise towers. We must learn the lessons from the past and not sit by and watch history repeat itself.
We must insist that large bodies like BCC and Berkeley Group approach this community with decency, humanity and respect. That they see people, not pound signs.
The Green Party is vocal and eloquent on the need to use more than crude economic arguments when making decisions that affect the lives of people, as you will see from this interview with deputy leader Adrian Ramsay.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c511lz64rrpo
5. I agree that we must work to provide clarity and commitment on plans for social and affordable housing, aiming to update current plans offering no social housing at all, and supporting accelerating repairs for properties that need them now.
Current plans show no commitment to social housing, and only a 16% commitment to affordable housing- affordable to who is a question we must ask. If the development claims to seek to improve quality of life in Ladywood, we must keep asking whose quality of life it seeks to improve. Will current residents still be able to afford to live there? Have they been meaningfully consulted? What improvements would current residents like to see? What guarantees are there that they will not be priced out of the area?
The current plan claims it will improve people’s lives, but actions have demonstrated otherwise – letters threatening Compulsory Purchase, poor communication, badly organised consultation, being invited to meetings then denied access, has all caused stress and distress, and does not speak well of the current organisation and planning.
6. I absolutely support raising “the matters affecting us in the House of Commons, especially the need to close viability loopholes in planning and strengthening diverse community input early on in, and throughout, regeneration planning”
I will continue to support these aims and use my voice on behalf of the people of Ladywood to challenge leaders on issues like this one, regardless of the results of this election.
MP Candidate response – Akhmed Yakoob (Independent)
Dear Respected Members of Ladywood Unite,
I commend you for your essential role in advocacy towards the residents of Ladywood. I deeply appreciate the time you dedicated to our meeting and the valuable insights shared by Ladywood Unite members during consultation. The uncertainty you face is profoundly unjust. The Ladywood residents are most certainly grappling with significant challenges due to the proposed regeneration plans formulated by the current Labour-run council. I am grateful for the opportunity to outline how I plan to support and represent the interests of residents when elected.
I commit to meeting with representatives of Ladywood Unite both before and after the election to establish the foundation for future engagement. I am dedicated to maintaining an ongoing dialogue with Ladywood Unite, scheduling regular consultations as I currently am and have been doing to ensure all community voices are heard and central to shaping our collaborative response. I believe that local community stakeholders should be included in ongoing discussions about the regeneration plans, and I will advocate strongly for this inclusion. I also pledge to continue representing their views over my vast social media following, which is in the surplus of 325,000 followers across various digital platforms.
I will act immediately to encourage the Labour-run council to produce a master plan with residents before any developer agreement is signed. This will help ensure that the community’s needs and perspectives are integral from the start, which is the minimum that they deserve. Additionally, I will support the council in forming a diverse residents’ forum that has the power to influence decisions, ensuring that all demographics are represented. I will also invite community stakeholders to be on my board of decision making once elected, unlike the current Labour representative who has consistently neglected the needs of residents for more than 3 years now.
I will continue advocating to stop the compulsory purchase order and any demolition of freehold houses, including leasehold houses and churches. I understand the deep concerns regarding the potential loss of homes and community spaces. As your MP, I refuse to stand idle whilst a majority of our community is displaced against their willingness. I will oppose any compulsory purchase orders and demolition that lacks clear, demonstrative benefits for all residents or fails to provide adequate and just compensation or other alternatives in the House of Commons. I will advocate for a complete reassessment of these plans, aiming for a community / locally led approach. Additionally, I will push for alternatives that preserve and enhance communal structures like the Ladywood Church, rather than demolishing them like our current Labour representatives. It must not be forgotten that small businesses are also at the brunt of the regeneration scheme. Not only will residents be displaced from their homes, but small businesses will also cease to exist if the regeneration scheme proceeds as planned, this will put peoples livelihoods at risk and unemployment will certainly increase as a result. This has also been highlighted within my manifesto.
I am committed to preventing the displacement of a diverse and vibrant community, aiming to preserve community and family networks across generations. From my observations and concerns of the residents I have met, it is clear that the heart of Ladywood lies in its community, its people, and its diversity but not within its elected representatives. I am dedicated to preserving the values of the electorate, rather than their council by ensuring any development respects and enhances these ties, preventing displacement and safeguarding the unique social dimensions of our area. This includes ensuring any movers are re-housed in a single move within their respective area if they wish and obtaining a similar if not identical offer for any residents who must move so that no one is left worse off in any way.
I will work to redress power imbalances favouring a luxury developer and the council over residents, whilst consistently advocating for residents to make decisions about their future. I pledge to challenge any unfair practices by developers or the council. It is crucial that developers engaging with Ladywood are reputable and have a history of responsible community engagement. I will continue pushing for transparency, accountability, and significant resident involvement in every step of the regeneration process.
I will provide clarity and commitment on plans for social and affordable housing, aiming to update current plans offering no social housing and supporting accelerated repairs for properties that need them now. I will work tirelessly to ensure the redevelopment plans include a substantial proportion of social and affordable housing. It is unacceptable for current plans to disregard the needs of those who require these accommodations most. I will push for immediate action on repairing existing properties that residents depend on and hold the council accountable for not meeting decent homes standards. Moreover, I will insist that meaningful community consultation and engagement, community facilities, social and affordable housing, and environmental concerns are addressed throughout the project.
In the House of Commons, I will raise the matters affecting us. When elected, I will advocate for legislative changes that close planning loopholes and enhance community participation, ensuring Ladywood’s voice is heard loud and clear in Parliament. I will also work to pass legislation that protects other communities from what we are experiencing, addressing issues like diversity, engagement in consultation and sustainability loopholes in planning.
I have also read the list of questions submitted by residents, and I want to reiterate that if elected, I will bring this to the table and renew the process with resident-led plans being drawn up with the council. The involvement of residents in these conversations is paramount, and I support forming a steering group that includes residents and skilled individuals who can contribute positively to the regeneration process. It must also be added that based off the views of residents and small business owners within the regeneration area, I attended a very successful protest in Ladywood, just outside the Methodist Church which gained international media coverage.
Whilst it may seem like electoral timing has spurred interest in Ladywood’s regeneration, the truth is that meaningful involvement can only begin once election to office has been granted. It is concerning that the current MP has not engaged as expected. It is actually quite sickening to hear that the representative who was voted in by the people, has since forgotten about those same people whilst being in office and neglecting their views. This election presents an opportunity for change, and I am openly committing to that change.
Additionally, I will work to ensure that residents’ voices are prioritised in any decision-making process, preventing outside interests from overshadowing the needs of the community. I am dedicated to protecting Ladywood’s heritage, culture, and future by fostering an environment where every resident feels valued and empowered to shape their own destiny. This includes updating the wording in the report to Cabinet that says an indicative masterplan exists, or publicly apologising for using unclear and inaccurate wording in this report. I will also publicly ask Birmingham City Council to apologise to residents for the continued disrespectful treatment and neglect received to date. I urge our Councillors and MP candidates to consider fully withdrawing their support for the regeneration on a moral basis, given the lack of meaningful community involvement and the limited use of several brownfield sites relative to the rest of the city.
Regarding concerns about the current state of Ladywood, I understand the frustration with dirty streets, rubbish, litter, and graffiti. Birmingham should not be one of the worst untidy and dirty cities in Britain. If elected, I will address these issues head-on. I will work to ensure that the streets are clean and free from litter and that graffiti is removed, especially in areas like the canals where it is most prevalent. These are not just minor issues; they affect the quality of life and the perception of safety in our community. I was born and bred in Ladywood, and also conduct business from Ladywood, meaning I am personally affected by these issues as are a wide variety of my friends and family members. I am committed to using my power as your MP to ensure that these problems are addressed promptly and effectively.
Please consider my candidacy as one dedicated to real change, genuine engagement, and the well-being of every Ladywood resident. I am willing to put in writing, before the election, my promise to support the choices wanted by the residents of Ladywood.
Our community deserves a representative who will fight for our interests and uphold the highest ethical standards. I am that candidate. I am dedicated to building a better future for all of us, one that is free from the divisive and harmful policies supported by the incompetent Labour Party, and the Incompetent Shabana Mahmood.
I extend my gratitude for your time and consideration of this literature. Should you have any enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact me or my team on any of the avenues listed below.
Yours sincerely,
MR. AKHMED YAKOOB
Independent Candidate for the Ladywood Constituency
MP Candidate response – Shabana Mahmood (Labour)
I have always been clear that any regeneration of Ladywood should not leave the existing community worse off. I have told Birmingham City Council the plans should not be a backdoor for mass gentrification of our neighbourhood, where people have put down roots and made their homes.
Since the regeneration proposals were announced, I have surveyed 1,600 residents who live within the regeneration zone, met with affected residents, and raised the concerns of local people directly with the developers. I have
also had productive discussions with representatives from Ladywood Unite.
My support for the regeneration project has always been conditional. Following a meeting with representatives from Ladywood Unite, I reiterate my three red lines:
A full and transparent consultation process with residents throughout the project – appointing a specialist to support the community.
Residents who want to stay in Ladywood are guaranteed to stay in Ladywood, and that they are rehoused in one move to prevent disruption.
A promise that new, quality community facilities are at the heart of the project and not an afterthought.
I won’t support any regeneration if the council step over my red lines. These have significant overlap with the six Ladywood Unite asks presented during the election campaign.
What I won’t do is make this issue a political football, or exploit it for electoral purpose – it’s simply too important. I won’t make promises I can’t deliver on, and I won’t use this issue to divide our community.
Through my survey and conversations with residents it’s clear there is a diversity of views on the regeneration proposals. I continue to give a voice to the broadest possible spectrum of opinion.
A year has passed since the regeneration proposals were announced and residents are still in the dark about plans for their neighbourhood. If re-elected, I pledge to send a second survey to every household in the regeneration zone to reassess the concerns of those affected by the plans. I will audit the council’s actions since June 2023 and seek a meeting with the new Managing Director of Birmingham City Council, Joanne Roney.
The council only have one chance to get this right and secure the future of Ladywood for generations to come. I hear the pain of residents and the distress this uncertainty is causing.
The council can and must do better. I want you to know that I am on your side.
MP Candidate response – Irene Yoong-Henery (Reform UK)
Did not provide a formal statement/reply, this is the email we received:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for contacting me about this important issue. I am aware about the mass compulsory purchase orders to move out Ladywood residents and it does not appear
morally right to displace thousands of residents to benefit a luxury developer. I have no confidence at all in Birmingham City Council coming out with a fair resolution
and I would be willing to work with you to support your residents, definitely.
I am aware that Council Tax has gone up by 21% over 2 years, so residents are paying more and more taxes, but getting less and less back in services. Council properties
should get timely and regular repairs.
I am not allowed to make pledges at this point, but I am prepared to meet you to discuss the proposals from the Council regarding demolition work, and see what
they have offered your residents in compensation. Do you represent a good proportion of the 6000 people affected by this issue? I am sorry but the link you provided
was disabled, so I cannot see any other document.
Best wishes,
Irene Yoong-Henery
Reform UK candidate for Birmingham Ladywood
—
Dear Irene,
Thank you for your response to our email.
We currently do not have any availability to meet in person but certainly happy to take questions by email. Our group represents all 4 phases of the proposed regeneration scheme.
We have not been offered any compensation or the details yet. That is part of the problem. The council are simply not engaging with the residents – they are keen on signing the new developer soon and we worry that it may be too late by then.
Kind regards
The Ladywood Unite Executive Committee
ladywoodunite@gmail.com
@LadywoodUnite
(no further reply was received)

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply